Category: books

the Hyperion Cantos, Dan Simmons, Problematic Authors, and SF

I will start this somewhat long post by stating clearly that I am not a literary guy. I’m not that poorly-read, but I am not an expert on literary analysis of theme, characters, setting, or anything else. I’m a librarian, dirty old skateboarder, tabletop RPG gamer, and enjoyer of science fiction. So this post is really me, thinking “out loud”, trying to reconcile my enjoyment of some novels with the recently-revealed-to-me probable horribleness of their author.

So, the author of the Hyperion Cantos, Dan Simmons, died recently.

I’ve read the first three books. I’ve been waiting to read the fourth one as kind of a year-end “treat” one of these years. People who don’t like SF will pick them apart, of course, but I think they are really good. I enjoyed them. They are “out there” even as SF goes. They contain some wild SF ideas all worked into a fairly complex “world”.

I have to admit that while reading them there are some problematic elements. Stuff where I thought “hmmmm…this is kinda wrong.” I find that a lot of the more “literary” SF authors (Heinlein in particular) go off the deep end at some point and start exploring their own weirdnesses in their writing. Sometimes they do it early in their careers and it just gets worse.

Perhaps this happens in other literary genres? I have mostly read SF. That’s what I know. I’d like to think that current SF authors are a little more thoughtful and aware of when they are being creeps, or racists, or whatever. Example: It is hard to read Starship Troopers and NOT conclude that Heinlein was a fascist wannabe. And don’t even get me started with the sexual weirdness in Time Enough for Love. One can say that the author is “exploring” how notions of morality might change in the future, but again, it often feels like they are just indulging themselves.

There are some things in the Cantos, especially Endymion, that when I read them I thought “wow – he is really treading close to the line on this.” Uncomfortably close.

To be fair, that book also contains one of the most moving beautiful scenes I’ve ever read in a SF novel. A stunning, well-written, understated moment of care, tenderness, and rebirth on the part of the protagonists, especially when contrasted with its analog on the part of the antagonists.

Most of the time descriptions of sex, women’s bodies, etc are done really poorly by SF writers. At best they are clumsy. At worst they are offensive. That kind of thing is just really now in the typical SF writer’s skill set. I find it better if they avoid it altogether, or just minimize it. They just don’t do it well, and honestly if you are reading SF maybe that isn’t what you are looking for? [insert horny nerd comment here]

It’s no secret that HP Lovecraft was a fairly typical racist of his time. Actually maybe quite a bit worse than typical. I don’t buy the arguments that people back then “didn’t know it was wrong.” Still, I have read almost all his work, and I think I have listened to all of it on audiobook. It just feels like sometime between Lovecraft’s life and Dan Simmons’ life things might have changed a bit more than they have.

So, back to Dan Simmons. I read the first three books in the Cantos over the last few years. I was told that his horror writing was good. Unlike many authors I enjoy I did not really read anything ** about** Simmons, other than a tiny bit about his background. Since his death a lot of criticism has been surfaced of both his personal views and some “problematic” stuff in his work. It seems like the personal views are, indeed, pretty bad. And when you read about his personal islamophobia and conservative dumbass-ism, it is really hard not to view even his better work through that lens.

And that is a bummer.

A lot of authors step in a big pile of dookie from time to time. One of my favorite SF novels, Downward to the Earth by Robert Silverberg, has a really clumsy intimate scene. It was written in 1970. Modern readers would certainly rip it apart. Silverberg was born in 1935. It’s clumsy, includes dopey descriptions of a woman’s body, but is about what I’d expect from a novel of it’s time. I will say that for all its clumsiness it is short and not just totally gratuitous. It’s a short, standalone SF novel. Now, it is certainly possible to write an incredibly offensive short novel, but I think when an author starts into these “mega-work” series of long novels maybe it just gives them too much freedom to indulge the dumber or more offensive parts of themselves.

It also feels like the more “noteworthy and literary” the author (Heinlein, Simmons, etc) the more prone they are to fall on their face. I have read well over a dozen SF novels by Alan Dean Fosterover the last few years. Foster has written a ton of books. He is known for doing lots of movie novelizations. A lot of people consider him to be kind of a “workman” author. I’ll admit his work usually doesn’t change my life, but taken as a whole his Humanx Commonwealth novels present an interesting setting and the stories are fun, exciting, and imaginative. Foster writes adventures.

In all the ADF novel’s I’ve read, I don’t think I’ve seen a single description of a woman’s breasts. Somehow Foster manages to write entire novels without bouncing boobily down the street. The only description I can think of that is even approaching a “bad description” of a woman’s body is in the Icerigger trilogy, in which one of the woman characters is chubby. In one of the Commonwealth books Foster talks about a male Thranx (an insectorid race) admiring a female’s ovipositors, which are twitching as if she is interested in him. I have wondered if Foster included this as a joke – kind of a gig at authors who love to describe women’s sexual characteristics. Considering that none of the other novels I’ve read have any of that stuff, I feel like it is meant that way. I emailed Mr. Foster, who did respond to an earlier email, but he has not yet responded. He’s a busy man.

You could, and I’m sure someone would, argue that the Humanx Commonwealth suffers from being a paternalistic colonial setting. Maybe so. It is a futuristic interstellar government of different planets that have been terraformed, colonized, invited into (but not forced), or otherwise added to the polity. Humans have spread to to other worlds and over the course of centuries formed a close relationship with the insectoid Thranx species. Thus – the Humanx in the name. It is colonialism? Hell, I don’t know. Is the United Federation of Planets, in Star Trek? I don’t think it matters, really. I feel like if you write novels, currently, to never cross any accepted line you might have some pretty homogenous and boring novels.

This all reminds me of when I found out that at least a couple of members of the band X are morons. It is disappointing.

I will probably read the final book of the Cantos, Rise of Endymion, this year. I will of course be reading it through a different lens than I read the previous three books.

Reading Update

The reading project is going pretty well. About to finish book #8 for the year.

https://bloftin2sf.blog/read-in-2024/

Looking at more recent science fiction, it is nearly impossible to find a good standalone novel. Everything seems to be part of a massive series, or a trilogy of books that are all 600 pages long. There are a few that look good, but I can’t keep a whole bunch of series straight in my mind at the same time. So while some of the older standalone novels are a bit rough around the edges in a lot of ways, I think I’ll stick to them between reading the two series I’ve been working on.

More On Reading

This year’s reading is going well. I’m on book #6 for the year, and finally might catch up on my Goodreads Challenge, as I’m only one book behind now. I got a slow start in January, but that’s fine. This isn’t supposed to be a stress-inducing thing. Just a goal.

I’m not rushing through the books. The idea of bumping my yearly goal up to 36 from 20 is simply to help me waste less time doing pretty much nothing. I’m reading at a relaxed pace and enjoying the books, not just cranking through them like a project to check them off the list when I’m done.

I’ve been doing a lot of “research” (which means mostly watching YouTube videos) about reading habits and how people approach daily reading. The first thing that became apparent is that there are lot of “BookTubers” out there, and everyone has lots of opinions. People I talk to in-person have lots of opinions, and I seek these out because I really want to know what people are doing with their reading and what they get from it.

I’m approaching one year of doing my 5% Reading Goal every day. I think my ability to focus and not get distracted by shiny objects (Instagram, Facebook, etc.) has improved a lot. I’ve also gotten much better at being able to sit and read, then talk with my wife for a bit or pet the dog or cat, then get right back to my reading and not feel like I lost my place. Essentially I’m using sustained reading to rehabilitate the concentration and focus that I’ve spent the last 20 years destroying with social media.

I’ve talked to people who say they just can’t concentrate on a book. Well, of course you can’t. You have been trained not to. The TV and the Internet don’t want you to. Sure, most of us are literate to the extent we can read, but like anything else reading is a skill, and you get better at it with practice. That’s why I think if you don’t read books now, it is good to start with tiny goals, like reading one page without checking your phone, and move up from there.

It’s given me a daily and yearly sense of accomplishment. If I read my 5% I never end my day feeling like I didn’t do anything for myself.

More SF Nerd Stuff

I made an attempt to read And Chaos Died the other night, by the late Joanna Russ.

I say “attempt” because about 5 pages in I realized it is not a casual read. This isn’t one to read while you watch America’s Funniest Home Videos. It will require some dedicated attention, solitude, and a non-weary mind. None of which I had the other night.

So I began Alan Dean Foster’s “Drowning World”, the fourth (chronological in-universe) of his standalone Humanx Commonwealth novels.

Here’s the thing about ADF. He’s not going to blow your mind with state of the art science fiction ideas, speculative science, hallucinogenic mind-fucks, or experimental narrative styles and structures. ADF tells a good, solid, entertaining science fiction story within his fictional universe. Within those stories you will find some humor, some surprises, and in this era of depressing “the universe hates us” science fiction ADF offers adventure and optimism (not unlike Star Trek).

ADF will drop you on to an alien planet, introduce you to weird aliens with weird names, and a hour later the names don’t seem weird and the aliens are beings you might even relate to. He’ll tell you one small story — one of thousands of possible stories — based in his setting.

There is something to be said for a novel you can just read and don’t  have to decipher.

September 2023 Reading

Another good reading month is coming to a close. In September I read four science fiction novels, and with a day left I am about 40% through #5. I suspect that that fifth will have to wait until October to get fished, but I have a good start!

Can’t remember if I mentioned this, but I sent a fan email to Alan Dean Foster and he sent me back a two line reply. I was geeking out. It was cool.

Anyway, I started with the next two standalone by Alan Dean Foster, set in his Humanx Commonwealth universe. Both were good. Then I read Robert Silverberg’s To Open the Sky, which is kind of classic Silverberg stuff and quite enjoyable. Finished the month with #20 in the Dumarest of Terra saga, by British SF author E.C. Tubb.

I am now reading Blood Music, the 1985 novel by Greg Bear. This is the first SF novel I’ve read in a while that isn’t space-oriented. I’m about 40% into it, and it’s good.

The reading is mostly being accomplished in the evenings from 8pm-10pm. There have been a couple of nights where I read my minimum-allowable-amount of 5%. As I continue this practice I’m finding that