Category: books

LibraryThing

I’ve been using Goodreads.com for many years. I think 15 years or more. Not sure. I’ve enjoyed it. It has a lot of fun features like setting your yearly reading challenge, etc. Lots of people are on it. Lots of my friends are on it. BUT it is owned by Amazon.com, and that always leaves a bad taste in my mouth. I feel like I’m contributing to their database. Now, they are providing the service, but it’s another one of those thing where I am really the product, not the customer.

I’ve been aware of LibraryThing.com for a long time as well. I’ve investigated it in the past and found it a bit clunkier than Goodreads. As part of my never-ending quest to cut my ties with giant corporate data-mining silos I revisted LibraryThing this week and was pleased with what I saw. I was particularly delighted to fine the Who We Are page, on which we learn exactly who built it and who runs it. As it turns out, LibraryThing is run by normal people, not megacorp techbro fiends, which makes me like it even more. They used to charge a fee for full membership, but some time ago they became totally free as some of their associated software products and services began to support the whole endeavor. After reading the information on their privacy page I feel they are the side of Good, rather than Evil.

So I used the Export function in Goodreads to download my data then I imported it into LibraryThing. The first two tries I messed it up and ended up with everything in my library showing up as “currently reading”, but it offers a one-button option to delete the entire import, which I did twice before getting it right. The import worked well.

As one would expect from a company that employs librarians, LibraryThing offers a lot more options for viewing and sorting your collection.

It also offers a rich system of book discussion groups.

LibraryThing has a very different look and feel from GoodReads, but I like it.

Home Libraries

  • Saw a Facebook group about home libraries. People posting pictures of their super cool home libraries. I am drawn to this idea, but I’m a public librarian and I know that when I die no one will want my books. Or any of my other stuff. I know this because every day people bring boxes and boxes of book donations, many from their recently deceased relatives. And I’m not going to go sit alone in a room in my house to read.
  • Still…a home library…would be sweet
  • I am slightly conflicted. Like maybe 15% conflicted

Reading Practices, Habits, and Phones

Yesterday I was doing some research on reading. When I say “research”, I mean I was searching the internet for ideas and sort of “lay-science” stuff about reading and it’s beneficial effects on your brain and your life. Yes, as all graduates of the School of Hard Knocks say, I was “doing my research.”

Being a reference librarian, I started out searching academic databases (GASP – I just blew it! Now you know my aforementioned academic credentials are fraudulent!) I found a couple of interesting papers, but overall the research seems to concentrate on teaching kids to read and youth literacy. That is of course important work, but not my interest here. I was looking for…

  1. Evidence that reading is good for the mental and physical health of adults and methods of helping adults
  2. Methods to help adults regain their ability to concentrate enough to read novels or other long-form literature
  3. Methods, ideas, and structures for helping adults develop a regular reading practice

Sadly, a lot of the blogs I found are — you guessed it – content marketing fake blogs. Not a person actually conveying their experience or ideas, but bullshit (probably generated by AI) content marketing. Let me digress for a moment and say that anyone involved in LLMs should be taken out and maimed.

I am sad to report that in a short two-hour session of searching, the best stuff I found was on YouTube. Fuck. Good grief. On one hand it is nice to find quality stuff there, but it saddens me that the good stuff in submerged in an endless ocean of sludge. Oh well, that’s the world we live in, so put on your hazmat suit and dive right in.

I found this video by Jared Henderson, called “How to Read Better.” Jared actually has a really nice channel full of longer-form videos, and after watching this and a few other of his videos I decided to “subscribe” to his channel. Jared’s observations and opinions included some pretty obvious stuff that I think most of us know, but he articulates it well. One of the obvious but true observations is – you guessed it – the negative effects of the cell phone. There’s other stuff too. Watch the video, and maybe some of his others.

Then I found this guy, Randy Ray, and this video. Liked his videos too. His advice is pretty much the same, but the video I linked to just now talks about some of the benefits of reading. Very cool. I watched a couple of Randy’s videos, and another thing I liked was his elucidation of the idea that reading is a skill and you can get better at it. Most of us “know how to read.” Most of us are functionally literate these days. I realize I may be glossing over some populations when I say that, but that’s another matter. An important matter, but beyond what I’m talking about now. But being functionally literate doesn’t mean you read well. Reading is a skill. Or maybe a set of sub-skills really. But like most skills, the more you do it the better you get at it. So it makes sense that if you don’t read much long-form writing you may struggle at first. A lot of people say they can’t concentrate. They say they are too busy. They’d like to read but there are obstacles like these. Well, the only way to solve that problem is to start small and read. Don’t worry too much about what you are reading. Find a book that is actually of interest to you, not something you are “supposed to read.”  If you can’t concentrate, start small. Read a page without checking your goddamn phone. Is that too much? No shame. Try a paragraph. Then think about that paragraph a bit. If your concentration has been destroyed by all the distracting factors of modern life you have to rebuild it. It’s been taken from you. Get mad! Take it back!

A couple of years ago I took all the social media off my phone, but over time it insidiously wormed its way back. Last night I once again removed all social media from it. I mean ALL. It’s going to remain off my phone. If I want to participate it will be on my computer, which means I can’t compulsively check it at a stop light, in a waiting room, or while sitting in my chair trying to read. And guess what? Last night I finished the book I was reading!

Anyway, my personal reading practice, which totally fell through last year due to me spending a lot of time working on tabletop RPG stuff, is read 5% of a novel every day. Minimum. I read on a Kindle for the most part, so it tracks percent completed. To me, 5% is a very doable number for daily reading. If I’m reading a 400-page novel, that means I need to read 20 pages a day. If I read a page in 1 minute on average, that’s about 20 – 30 minutes of reading. I can do that. That means that if I stick to it I complete a book every 20 days. Normally I read more than that, but if I just read at my minimum level I feel good about my day no matter what kind of day it is.

I will say there is some super bad advice on YouTube about reading as well as these two stellar channels I’ve mentioned. I saw one guy talking about always having a pen and marking up books as you read. This is a horrible idea. HORRIBLE. Sentences have a flow. Paragraphs and pages and chapters and entire books have a flow. Even non-fiction. I can think of no better way to destroy the reading experience that obsessively taking notes while you read. Read the damned thing, and think about it, and then you can go back and make notes later. YouTubers who stress bullshit like constant note taking tend to view reading as simply extracting information from a text. It reeks of techbro optimizer douchbag culture.

You will not develop a regular practice of reading by making the experience a drag.

If you care to do so, I do think journaling about what you read can be useful. I keep a blog about my science fiction reading. It’s fun. I don’t dig into a ton of details. I just write what I think about a book. Sometimes I just note that I began it and finished it. Sometimes more. It is a nice chance to take a little time and reflect on what you just read. I think that’s a good thing.

Well, this has been kind of an all over the place screed, I know. Need to get it off my chest and share some good videos.

Retirement and Science Fiction

Been thinking about things I want to do after I retire at the end of the year. For the last few years I’ve returned to one of my favorite pastime’s, reading science fiction. I’ve been keeping a blog about my reading over on micro.blog, called ReadingSF.Micro.blog.

micro.blog has an excellent bookshelves function. It is one of the oldest features of that system, and makes it very convenient to blog and/or podcast about books. It helps that the developer, Manton, likes to read and that his wife is a trained librarian (and an old grad school friend of mine).

One thing I’m going to do even more during retirement is read. I’m going to spend 1-2 hours a day reading. I’m thinking about really make that reading blog a more in-depth kind of thing. While I’m not planning to go back to school and become an academic, I’m thinking I’ll make that blog and my interest in SF into a “real project.”

So are this years I’ve not read as much as I’d like. For the last 2 years I’ve put a lot of energy into running and playing tabletop roleplaying games, which is a time-intensive hobby. But next year I will have time to relax, without any screens, and read very day. I’m really looking forward to that. I’m not sure why I feel compelled to write about everything I do, but that’s how I’m wired.

Reading

When I retire, one daily practice that I insist on is at least an hour of quiet reading every day. No noise. No internet. No TV. Just reading.

I think reading is one of the best things you can do.

the Hyperion Cantos, Dan Simmons, Problematic Authors, and SF

I will start this somewhat long post by stating clearly that I am not a literary guy. I’m not that poorly-read, but I am not an expert on literary analysis of theme, characters, setting, or anything else. I’m a librarian, dirty old skateboarder, tabletop RPG gamer, and enjoyer of science fiction. So this post is really me, thinking “out loud”, trying to reconcile my enjoyment of some novels with the recently-revealed-to-me probable horribleness of their author.

So, the author of the Hyperion Cantos, Dan Simmons, died recently.

I’ve read the first three books. I’ve been waiting to read the fourth one as kind of a year-end “treat” one of these years. People who don’t like SF will pick them apart, of course, but I think they are really good. I enjoyed them. They are “out there” even as SF goes. They contain some wild SF ideas all worked into a fairly complex “world”.

I have to admit that while reading them there are some problematic elements. Stuff where I thought “hmmmm…this is kinda wrong.” I find that a lot of the more “literary” SF authors (Heinlein in particular) go off the deep end at some point and start exploring their own weirdnesses in their writing. Sometimes they do it early in their careers and it just gets worse.

Perhaps this happens in other literary genres? I have mostly read SF. That’s what I know. I’d like to think that current SF authors are a little more thoughtful and aware of when they are being creeps, or racists, or whatever. Example: It is hard to read Starship Troopers and NOT conclude that Heinlein was a fascist wannabe. And don’t even get me started with the sexual weirdness in Time Enough for Love. One can say that the author is “exploring” how notions of morality might change in the future, but again, it often feels like they are just indulging themselves.

There are some things in the Cantos, especially Endymion, that when I read them I thought “wow – he is really treading close to the line on this.” Uncomfortably close.

To be fair, that book also contains one of the most moving beautiful scenes I’ve ever read in a SF novel. A stunning, well-written, understated moment of care, tenderness, and rebirth on the part of the protagonists, especially when contrasted with its analog on the part of the antagonists.

Most of the time descriptions of sex, women’s bodies, etc are done really poorly by SF writers. At best they are clumsy. At worst they are offensive. That kind of thing is just really now in the typical SF writer’s skill set. I find it better if they avoid it altogether, or just minimize it. They just don’t do it well, and honestly if you are reading SF maybe that isn’t what you are looking for? [insert horny nerd comment here]

It’s no secret that HP Lovecraft was a fairly typical racist of his time. Actually maybe quite a bit worse than typical. I don’t buy the arguments that people back then “didn’t know it was wrong.” Still, I have read almost all his work, and I think I have listened to all of it on audiobook. It just feels like sometime between Lovecraft’s life and Dan Simmons’ life things might have changed a bit more than they have.

So, back to Dan Simmons. I read the first three books in the Cantos over the last few years. I was told that his horror writing was good. Unlike many authors I enjoy I did not really read anything ** about** Simmons, other than a tiny bit about his background. Since his death a lot of criticism has been surfaced of both his personal views and some “problematic” stuff in his work. It seems like the personal views are, indeed, pretty bad. And when you read about his personal islamophobia and conservative dumbass-ism, it is really hard not to view even his better work through that lens.

And that is a bummer.

A lot of authors step in a big pile of dookie from time to time. One of my favorite SF novels, Downward to the Earth by Robert Silverberg, has a really clumsy intimate scene. It was written in 1970. Modern readers would certainly rip it apart. Silverberg was born in 1935. It’s clumsy, includes dopey descriptions of a woman’s body, but is about what I’d expect from a novel of it’s time. I will say that for all its clumsiness it is short and not just totally gratuitous. It’s a short, standalone SF novel. Now, it is certainly possible to write an incredibly offensive short novel, but I think when an author starts into these “mega-work” series of long novels maybe it just gives them too much freedom to indulge the dumber or more offensive parts of themselves.

It also feels like the more “noteworthy and literary” the author (Heinlein, Simmons, etc) the more prone they are to fall on their face. I have read well over a dozen SF novels by Alan Dean Fosterover the last few years. Foster has written a ton of books. He is known for doing lots of movie novelizations. A lot of people consider him to be kind of a “workman” author. I’ll admit his work usually doesn’t change my life, but taken as a whole his Humanx Commonwealth novels present an interesting setting and the stories are fun, exciting, and imaginative. Foster writes adventures.

In all the ADF novel’s I’ve read, I don’t think I’ve seen a single description of a woman’s breasts. Somehow Foster manages to write entire novels without bouncing boobily down the street. The only description I can think of that is even approaching a “bad description” of a woman’s body is in the Icerigger trilogy, in which one of the woman characters is chubby. In one of the Commonwealth books Foster talks about a male Thranx (an insectorid race) admiring a female’s ovipositors, which are twitching as if she is interested in him. I have wondered if Foster included this as a joke – kind of a gig at authors who love to describe women’s sexual characteristics. Considering that none of the other novels I’ve read have any of that stuff, I feel like it is meant that way. I emailed Mr. Foster, who did respond to an earlier email, but he has not yet responded. He’s a busy man.

You could, and I’m sure someone would, argue that the Humanx Commonwealth suffers from being a paternalistic colonial setting. Maybe so. It is a futuristic interstellar government of different planets that have been terraformed, colonized, invited into (but not forced), or otherwise added to the polity. Humans have spread to to other worlds and over the course of centuries formed a close relationship with the insectoid Thranx species. Thus – the Humanx in the name. It is colonialism? Hell, I don’t know. Is the United Federation of Planets, in Star Trek? I don’t think it matters, really. I feel like if you write novels, currently, to never cross any accepted line you might have some pretty homogenous and boring novels.

This all reminds me of when I found out that at least a couple of members of the band X are morons. It is disappointing.

I will probably read the final book of the Cantos, Rise of Endymion, this year. I will of course be reading it through a different lens than I read the previous three books.

Reading Update

The reading project is going pretty well. About to finish book #8 for the year.

https://bloftin2sf.blog/read-in-2024/

Looking at more recent science fiction, it is nearly impossible to find a good standalone novel. Everything seems to be part of a massive series, or a trilogy of books that are all 600 pages long. There are a few that look good, but I can’t keep a whole bunch of series straight in my mind at the same time. So while some of the older standalone novels are a bit rough around the edges in a lot of ways, I think I’ll stick to them between reading the two series I’ve been working on.

More On Reading

This year’s reading is going well. I’m on book #6 for the year, and finally might catch up on my Goodreads Challenge, as I’m only one book behind now. I got a slow start in January, but that’s fine. This isn’t supposed to be a stress-inducing thing. Just a goal.

I’m not rushing through the books. The idea of bumping my yearly goal up to 36 from 20 is simply to help me waste less time doing pretty much nothing. I’m reading at a relaxed pace and enjoying the books, not just cranking through them like a project to check them off the list when I’m done.

I’ve been doing a lot of “research” (which means mostly watching YouTube videos) about reading habits and how people approach daily reading. The first thing that became apparent is that there are lot of “BookTubers” out there, and everyone has lots of opinions. People I talk to in-person have lots of opinions, and I seek these out because I really want to know what people are doing with their reading and what they get from it.

I’m approaching one year of doing my 5% Reading Goal every day. I think my ability to focus and not get distracted by shiny objects (Instagram, Facebook, etc.) has improved a lot. I’ve also gotten much better at being able to sit and read, then talk with my wife for a bit or pet the dog or cat, then get right back to my reading and not feel like I lost my place. Essentially I’m using sustained reading to rehabilitate the concentration and focus that I’ve spent the last 20 years destroying with social media.

I’ve talked to people who say they just can’t concentrate on a book. Well, of course you can’t. You have been trained not to. The TV and the Internet don’t want you to. Sure, most of us are literate to the extent we can read, but like anything else reading is a skill, and you get better at it with practice. That’s why I think if you don’t read books now, it is good to start with tiny goals, like reading one page without checking your phone, and move up from there.

It’s given me a daily and yearly sense of accomplishment. If I read my 5% I never end my day feeling like I didn’t do anything for myself.

More SF Nerd Stuff

I made an attempt to read And Chaos Died the other night, by the late Joanna Russ.

I say “attempt” because about 5 pages in I realized it is not a casual read. This isn’t one to read while you watch America’s Funniest Home Videos. It will require some dedicated attention, solitude, and a non-weary mind. None of which I had the other night.

So I began Alan Dean Foster’s “Drowning World”, the fourth (chronological in-universe) of his standalone Humanx Commonwealth novels.

Here’s the thing about ADF. He’s not going to blow your mind with state of the art science fiction ideas, speculative science, hallucinogenic mind-fucks, or experimental narrative styles and structures. ADF tells a good, solid, entertaining science fiction story within his fictional universe. Within those stories you will find some humor, some surprises, and in this era of depressing “the universe hates us” science fiction ADF offers adventure and optimism (not unlike Star Trek).

ADF will drop you on to an alien planet, introduce you to weird aliens with weird names, and a hour later the names don’t seem weird and the aliens are beings you might even relate to. He’ll tell you one small story — one of thousands of possible stories — based in his setting.

There is something to be said for a novel you can just read and don’t  have to decipher.

September 2023 Reading

Another good reading month is coming to a close. In September I read four science fiction novels, and with a day left I am about 40% through #5. I suspect that that fifth will have to wait until October to get fished, but I have a good start!

Can’t remember if I mentioned this, but I sent a fan email to Alan Dean Foster and he sent me back a two line reply. I was geeking out. It was cool.

Anyway, I started with the next two standalone by Alan Dean Foster, set in his Humanx Commonwealth universe. Both were good. Then I read Robert Silverberg’s To Open the Sky, which is kind of classic Silverberg stuff and quite enjoyable. Finished the month with #20 in the Dumarest of Terra saga, by British SF author E.C. Tubb.

I am now reading Blood Music, the 1985 novel by Greg Bear. This is the first SF novel I’ve read in a while that isn’t space-oriented. I’m about 40% into it, and it’s good.

The reading is mostly being accomplished in the evenings from 8pm-10pm. There have been a couple of nights where I read my minimum-allowable-amount of 5%. As I continue this practice I’m finding that

 

Reading n stuff

Finished reading my 15th novel of the year today at lunch.

I know I keep harping on this, but it feels good. It feels like an accomplishment. While I do have a 20-book goal for the year, I’m not just trying to race through these novels. There is no point in that. I’m reading at an enjoyable, casual speed and really immersing myself in them. It is the consistency of ready at least 5% of a novel every day this is creating the success because it is becoming 1) something I look forward to and 2) a habit.

Tonight I’m starting a novel by SF author Robert Silverberg. I’ve read a number of his novels and they have been enjoyable. While I knew of him already, a few years ago I read his short story The Iron Star in this anthology of space opera and military SF. I was kinda blown away by the emotional and ethical impact of this story and it made me a fan. Silverberg, like many of his generation of authors, really started writing in the SF magazines and went through a formative period in which he wrote a hell of a lot of stuff. The material I’ve read is from his “mature author” era. His work from this period can be a bit more cerebral than some of the adventure space opera stuff I’ve been reading a lot of lately. It will be a good shift for me.

Reading

As I have told a few friends, I’ve been spending time reading every day that I suppose was previously devoted to farting around aimlessly on the internet. I started this in April, and since then I’ve read 11 science fiction novels.

If you read 5% of a novel every day you will finish that novel in 20 days. I know that books vary in page counts (obviously) but that means for a 300 page novel, 15 pages a day will get you through that novel in 20 days. That’s pretty good.

So even if I only have 20 or 30 minutes to read it is worth the effort. Usually I get started and end up reading 10 or 15 percent, at least. Having the Kindle charged and ready and in my backpack during the workday is key.

Anyway I’m making a project of this, with the very modest goal of reading 20 SF novels this year. Tracking them on my Goodreads account.

Doing the unthinkable

Well, not really unthinkable. I’ve thought if it many times, and done it many times.

I am getting rid of most of my books. In fact, I just did it. Over the weekend I boxed up 90% of my books, and today at work I donated them to the library, which will sell them either in the book sale or via a vendor who sells our nonfiction donations for a good price and splits the money with the Friends of the library (so it eventually benefits the library, just like the in-building book sale does).

I had a lot of books sitting there, taking up space in my office, doing nothing. I kept a few books about skateboarding. I’m a skateboarder. They are inspiring to me and to some extent represent who I am. I’m not the other things.

It feels good to be rid of them.

Reading

It’s been a rough couple of weeks for reading. Sometimes life is like that. Things going on. Stressful things, and I am just so beat I can’t concentrate on a book. Still, gonna plan to knock out the short novel I’m currently reading this weekend and start another.

A while back I downloaded the audiobook of The Three-Body Problem, by Liu Cixin. I listened to the first 30 minutes of this acclaimed novel and found it to be just unlistenable. Now, this is weird because a lot of people whose opinions I respect really love this novel and the series. I am aware of what it is about. Yes, I’ve watched a lot of videos on Quinn’s Ideas about it. Yet still I found it pretty horrible.

Over the last few nights I’ve given it another try.  I’m doing better with it.

I don’t know if I have ever read a novel translated from Mandarin before. I feel like there might be some translation issues I’m running into. Let’s face it, literary translation is a very hard discipline. I am friends with one of the foremost translators of Mexican literature into English, and we’ve talked about it, and it is as much an art as writing the novel in the first place.

The other possibility is that the novel, even in its original language, reads like a technical manual.

At any rate, I’m listening because while it “listens” kind of soulless, the ideas are huge and interesting and I like them.

Another thing: because the last “big series” I read was Hyperion and the Fall of Hyperion, the bar may be set pretty high. They were some of the best SF I’ve ever read, and wonderfully written.

Science Fiction Novels

As I may have written here before (I honestly can’t remember and don’t feel like looking) for the last several years I’ve been going back and reading science fiction novels from the 70s and 80s. Typically I’ve been reading standalone novels, not series.

Those novels tend to be a bit simpler in form. When I get off work I’m tired, and I don’t need a novel to be that much an intellectual effort to understand. Some of my favorite novels, like William Gibson’s Sprawl trilogy, require that you really immerse yourself in the novel. That’s great, but when I’m tired sometimes I just want the author to tell me what happened.

That being said, read the Sprawl trilogy.

I discovered Robert Silverberg in the Infinite Stars anthology of space opera. His tale “the Iron Star” was brilliant, and I became an instant fan. I’ve read three or four of his other novels since then. They are great stuff. The Iron Star offered an ethical conundrum, and I was just blown away.

I feel like as you go back through the decades the SF gets a bit more basic, and not as well written, but Silverberg is really good. I read a few H. Beam Piper novels (not the Little Fuzzy books), including the Cosmic Computer and the unfortunately-titled “Space Viking“.  They were fun reads, though every time I read the term Space Viking I rolled my eyes. Great fodder for my Traveller science fiction game campaign. It was funny knowing that Piper was an early libertarian going into these novels (thank you Wikipedia), and then seeing his political leanings in the novels.  I do like to read a bit about the authors I’m reading, and sorta know where they are coming from, and where the novels fall in their careers.

I mentioned Traveller. One of the primary influences on the Traveller RPG were the Dumarest of Terra novels, by English author E.C. Tubb. These are what I’d call “pulp” style SF adventures. Space Opera for sure. Short novels, formulaic in many respects. There are about 32 in the series, and I’m currently reading #17. Now, my intro to science fiction was Doc Savage. As a young teen I read about 70 of those. I have to say, while the Dumarest novels are not the most sophisticated SF you will find, Tubb can write a proper sentence. They are pretty well written, and they are fun. Now, they are novels of their time.  The hero, Earl Dumarest, is a typical hero of the era, and you’ll be hard-pressed to find a female character of any real consequence. They all tend to be Earl’s love interest, which means they will be dead soon. Overall, I would say the novels exhibit the chauvinism of their time, but I’ve not seen them go into straight-up misogyny. Which is nice, because I’d stop reading them. Would they be better if there some female characters to be reckoned with? Yes. No doubt.

Which brings me to my most recent reads, Hyperion and Fall of Hyperion, by Dan Simmons. Not simple. Not short.

Now people love to go on and on about how great Dune is. I enjoy the Dune novels. They are deep and they are good. I enjoyed these two Hyperion novels more. If it means anything to you, these novels are Dune-level good.  They are deep and multilayered. There’s a lot going on. There’s stuff in them, and they were written in the late 80s/early 90s, that is way ahead of their time. They are long. Each is over 500 pages. I’m a slow reader, so that is a time investment for me. Totally worth it. Great stuff. After reading each one I listened to them on audio books to enhance the experience. So, so good.

I’ve got a good stack of books to read, and a good virtual stack on my Kindle. More later.