the Hyperion Cantos, Dan Simmons, Problematic Authors, and SF

I will start this somewhat long post by stating clearly that I am not a literary guy. I’m not that poorly-read, but I am not an expert on literary analysis of theme, characters, setting, or anything else. I’m a librarian, dirty old skateboarder, tabletop RPG gamer, and enjoyer of science fiction. So this post is really me, thinking “out loud”, trying to reconcile my enjoyment of some novels with the recently-revealed-to-me probable horribleness of their author.

So, the author of the Hyperion Cantos, Dan Simmons, died recently.

I’ve read the first three books. I’ve been waiting to read the fourth one as kind of a year-end “treat” one of these years. People who don’t like SF will pick them apart, of course, but I think they are really good. I enjoyed them. They are “out there” even as SF goes. They contain some wild SF ideas all worked into a fairly complex “world”.

I have to admit that while reading them there are some problematic elements. Stuff where I thought “hmmmm…this is kinda wrong.” I find that a lot of the more “literary” SF authors (Heinlein in particular) go off the deep end at some point and start exploring their own weirdnesses in their writing. Sometimes they do it early in their careers and it just gets worse.

Perhaps this happens in other literary genres? I have mostly read SF. That’s what I know. I’d like to think that current SF authors are a little more thoughtful and aware of when they are being creeps, or racists, or whatever. Example: It is hard to read Starship Troopers and NOT conclude that Heinlein was a fascist wannabe. And don’t even get me started with the sexual weirdness in Time Enough for Love. One can say that the author is “exploring” how notions of morality might change in the future, but again, it often feels like they are just indulging themselves.

There are some things in the Cantos, especially Endymion, that when I read them I thought “wow – he is really treading close to the line on this.” Uncomfortably close.

To be fair, that book also contains one of the most moving beautiful scenes I’ve ever read in a SF novel. A stunning, well-written, understated moment of care, tenderness, and rebirth on the part of the protagonists, especially when contrasted with its analog on the part of the antagonists.

Most of the time descriptions of sex, women’s bodies, etc are done really poorly by SF writers. At best they are clumsy. At worst they are offensive. That kind of thing is just really now in the typical SF writer’s skill set. I find it better if they avoid it altogether, or just minimize it. They just don’t do it well, and honestly if you are reading SF maybe that isn’t what you are looking for? [insert horny nerd comment here]

It’s no secret that HP Lovecraft was a fairly typical racist of his time. Actually maybe quite a bit worse than typical. I don’t buy the arguments that people back then “didn’t know it was wrong.” Still, I have read almost all his work, and I think I have listened to all of it on audiobook. It just feels like sometime between Lovecraft’s life and Dan Simmons’ life things might have changed a bit more than they have.

So, back to Dan Simmons. I read the first three books in the Cantos over the last few years. I was told that his horror writing was good. Unlike many authors I enjoy I did not really read anything ** about** Simmons, other than a tiny bit about his background. Since his death a lot of criticism has been surfaced of both his personal views and some “problematic” stuff in his work. It seems like the personal views are, indeed, pretty bad. And when you read about his personal islamophobia and conservative dumbass-ism, it is really hard not to view even his better work through that lens.

And that is a bummer.

A lot of authors step in a big pile of dookie from time to time. One of my favorite SF novels, Downward to the Earth by Robert Silverberg, has a really clumsy intimate scene. It was written in 1970. Modern readers would certainly rip it apart. Silverberg was born in 1935. It’s clumsy, includes dopey descriptions of a woman’s body, but is about what I’d expect from a novel of it’s time. I will say that for all its clumsiness it is short and not just totally gratuitous. It’s a short, standalone SF novel. Now, it is certainly possible to write an incredibly offensive short novel, but I think when an author starts into these “mega-work” series of long novels maybe it just gives them too much freedom to indulge the dumber or more offensive parts of themselves.

It also feels like the more “noteworthy and literary” the author (Heinlein, Simmons, etc) the more prone they are to fall on their face. I have read well over a dozen SF novels by Alan Dean Fosterover the last few years. Foster has written a ton of books. He is known for doing lots of movie novelizations. A lot of people consider him to be kind of a “workman” author. I’ll admit his work usually doesn’t change my life, but taken as a whole his Humanx Commonwealth novels present an interesting setting and the stories are fun, exciting, and imaginative. Foster writes adventures.

In all the ADF novel’s I’ve read, I don’t think I’ve seen a single description of a woman’s breasts. Somehow Foster manages to write entire novels without bouncing boobily down the street. The only description I can think of that is even approaching a “bad description” of a woman’s body is in the Icerigger trilogy, in which one of the woman characters is chubby. In one of the Commonwealth books Foster talks about a male Thranx (an insectorid race) admiring a female’s ovipositors, which are twitching as if she is interested in him. I have wondered if Foster included this as a joke – kind of a gig at authors who love to describe women’s sexual characteristics. Considering that none of the other novels I’ve read have any of that stuff, I feel like it is meant that way. I emailed Mr. Foster, who did respond to an earlier email, but he has not yet responded. He’s a busy man.

You could, and I’m sure someone would, argue that the Humanx Commonwealth suffers from being a paternalistic colonial setting. Maybe so. It is a futuristic interstellar government of different planets that have been terraformed, colonized, invited into (but not forced), or otherwise added to the polity. Humans have spread to to other worlds and over the course of centuries formed a close relationship with the insectoid Thranx species. Thus – the Humanx in the name. It is colonialism? Hell, I don’t know. Is the United Federation of Planets, in Star Trek? I don’t think it matters, really. I feel like if you write novels, currently, to never cross any accepted line you might have some pretty homogenous and boring novels.

This all reminds me of when I found out that at least a couple of members of the band X are morons. It is disappointing.

I will probably read the final book of the Cantos, Rise of Endymion, this year. I will of course be reading it through a different lens than I read the previous three books.

Slow Down

Saw a blogger I follow expounding on the value of AI to make everything he does easier and accelerate everything.

I reject the notion that things – anything – needs to be accelerated. That’s a pernicious idea that’s been created by the tech bros and capitalists to further enslave us.

Everyone needs to slow down.

Productivity is a lie.

Thinking about writing in the coming years

Even before AI became an always-present burglar in our electronic homes I have been somewhat guarded about posting my writing here. That’s why I mostly seem to post pictures of my cat, dog, skateboard wheels, and other stuff that is still easily stealable but really doesn’t matter (Yes, I know about the “robots.txt” file and all that. No, I don’t believe it is respected. Anyone who trusts the tech bros is an idiot).

This was less the case when I started this blog in 2006, but has become increasingly so. I have a folder on my computer and Dropbox of writing that I’m actually kind of proud of, that I have never published anywhere. Stories about things like 1) the time I shot a bird when i was a kid and felt bad about it, and 2) a “friend” who was a bully.

I’m not a “real” writer. I’ve never been published anywhere. Still, I value these unpublished works. They are MINE. No AI could have ever written them, and they are not going to be stolen by Google, OpenAI, or any of the other scumbags out there stealing people’s creative work.

I’ve considered putting them in an actual print ‘zine. Maybe when I’m retired I’ll do that. I have a small collection of what I’d call long-form ‘zines. Stuff never available electronically, that I ordered from varous ‘zine distros because they looked interesting. Honestly, some of them are fantastic. I don’t really collect things other than music (LPs and CDs) and Traveller RPG gaming books (the Classic version of the game, with the small softback book size). However, I’ve kept a small collection of ‘zines. I’ve probably got about 30 of them. All super good, all classic xerox-copy foldover style. They don’t take up much space, so I’ve never gotten rid of them.

One of the ‘zine makers I really like is Aaron Lake Smith. He did a series of ‘zines called Big Hands. They are brilliant. Until I started writing this post I hadn’t thought of him in several years, so I looked him up. You can find him on his website. He also seems to do most of his writing (according to him) on Substack now, which kind of bumbs me out. I hate Substack, and I hate seeing anyone with talent posting their creative work there, but I also understand that if you are a professional writer you need to be where people can find you, and the sad truth is that big shitty silos like substack are that place. So, against my normal ethical blockade of Substack-hosted writing, I checked out his stuff there and read one of his articles and it was really good. I still hate Substack though.

Lately I’ve been thinking a lot about what I want to do during retirement. Yes, I am planning to retire at the end of 2026. It seems weird to say that, but the years are flying by, and our lives with them. I am one of the fortunate few people I know who can really consider it and I’m going to take advantage of that fact. I’ve been a librarian now for 30 years. That’s enough.

Over the last 20 years, at least, I’ve become an compulsive writer/blogger. I want to continue that. I want to increase it. I want to spend time every day writing. So I really am kinda torn on what to do with my writing. We’ll see. I am probably going to start a new website/blog and post there since I don’t need to make any money. I’d like to have a few readers though. I will not, however, be using one of the big silos. Whatever I do will be mine, entirely.

Confusion

It must be confusing to be a Republican voter in Texas (or elsewhere), especially in the primaries. How do they figure out which candidate is the absolute stupidest asshole they could pick? I suppose they have reach down deep in their dead souls and figure it out.